Register free! 
SC Cases - Judgement
[ 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | 2013 ]  

 
First | Prev | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | Next | Last
Documents Found: 4612   
Title Forum  Year
Jagdish Mandal vs State of Orissa and Ors. [LexDoc Id : 306383]
SC 2006
Ramnath International Construction (P) Ltd. vs UOI [LexDoc Id : 305623]
SC 2006
Kalyani Baskar vs M.S. Sampoornam [LexDoc Id : 305616]
SC 2006
U.P. Gram Panchayat Adhikari Sangh and Ors. vs Daya Ram Saroj and Ors. [LexDoc Id : 305615]
SC 2006
Jagjit Singh vs State of Haryana and Ors. [LexDoc Id : 305488]
SC 2006
Bhimashya and Ors. vs Janabi @ Janawwa [LexDoc Id : 305487]
SC 2006
Indian Charge Chrome Ltd. and Anr. vs UOI and Ors. [LexDoc Id : 305486]
SC 2006
Adhyaatamam - Bhamini vs Jagdish Ambalal Shah [LexDoc Id : 305484]
SC 2006
Raksha Plantations (P) Ltd., In Re [LexDoc Id : 348818]
CLB 2006
CIT vs Gujarat Distributors Reference to High Court-Tribunal decision on facts-The tribunal had given a finding of fact on appreciation of facts on record that certain transactions were not that of the assessee. The findings were [LexDoc Id : 326376]
HC (Gujarat) 2006
UOP LLC vs Addl. DIT Powers of Tribunal-Admission of: additional evidence-AY 2001-02. The Tribunal could admit additional evidence which was relevant for a just decision and come into possession of the department after filin [LexDoc Id : 325167]
ITAT (Delhi) 2006
Jose Kuruvinakkunnel vs ITO Validity of sanction for reassessment-Non-application of mind-The sanction for reassessment given by the CIT without application of mind was invalid.

S.151 of the Income Tax Act 1961 [LexDoc Id : 323363]
ITAT (Cochin) 2006
CIT vs Global Corpn. Ltd. Deduction: Income from exports-Loss on export of goods-AY 1996-97. No deduction under s.80HHC of the Income Tax Act 1961 was permissible since even after sale of import licence and receipt of duty drawback [LexDoc Id : 321238]
HC (Karnataka) 2006
Hanuman Meena vs Chandra Singh [LexDoc Id : 320804]
HC (Rajasthan) 2006
Hemlata vs Praveen Kumar [LexDoc Id : 320803]
HC (Rajasthan) 2006
UPO LLC vs Additional Director of Income Tax Powers of Tribunal-Procedure for admission of additional evidence- AY 2001-02. The tribunal was empowered to admit the additional evidence not only if it required such evidence to ‘enable it to pronounce judgment’ b [LexDoc Id : 318027]
ITAT (Delhi) 2006
Vijesh Gupta vs GTO Deemed gift: Adequacy of consideration-FMV determined by DVO-AY 1997-98. The difference between the fair market value of the assessee’s property as determined by the DVO and the sale consideration received by th [LexDoc Id : 317359]
ITAT (Delhi) 2006
M.M. Financiers (P) Ltd. vs DCIT Undisclosed income: Unsigned agreement-Document found in search not acted upon-Block Period 24 November 1994 – 20 March 1998. A search under s.132 of the Income Tax Act 1961 was conducted at the premises of the assessee company’s [LexDoc Id : 317358]
ITAT (Chennai) 2006
Indian Rayon and Industries Ltd. vs State of Gujarat and Anr. [LexDoc Id : 317193]
HC (Gujarat) 2006
Jubiliant Enpro Ltd. vs DCIT Speculation loss-Fall in market price of shares held as stock in trade-The loss suffered by the assessee due to fall in market price of shares held as stock in trade was speculation loss.

S.73 of the Income Tax [LexDoc Id : 316764]
HC (Delhi) 2006
Silicon Graphics Systems (I) (P) Ltd. vs DCIT Deduction on actual payment-Payment of customs duty- The entire amount of customs duty paid by the assessee in the relevant year was deductible, even if the amount was included in the valuation of clos [LexDoc Id : 316697]
ITAT (Delhi) 2006
UOI vs Gupta Builders (P) Ltd. and Ors. Prosecution: Failure to pay TDS-Limitation for launching prosecution-The assessee had not paid the tax deducted at source. No notice to the assessee was necessary for launching prosecution. The prosecution was launched [LexDoc Id : 316494]
HC (Bombay) 2006
Sunash Investment Co. vs ACIT Penalty: Concealment of income-Expenses on exempt income, Bona fide belief-No penalty for concealment of income could be levied on the assessee, who, under a bona fide belief that interest expenditure incurred on borrowed fun [LexDoc Id : 315715]
ITAT (Mumbai) 2006
Sita Devi vs Bihar State Housing Board and Ors. [LexDoc Id : 309825]
SC 2006
CIT vs Rameshwar Dass Suresh Pal Cheeka Appeal to the high court: Question of fact-Genuineness of cash credits-The question whether the assessee firm’s explanation as to the nature and source of the amounts credited in its books of accounts was satisfactory or [LexDoc Id : 306645]
HC (Punjab and Haryana) 2006
 
First | Prev | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | Next | Last